Double
Trouble Frequencies in search of what is safe and what is not biologically safe
for use in modern communication systems by Dr Chris Barnes,
Manager at Bangor Scientific and Educational Consultants E-mail mamager@besc-wales.co.uk
Abstract
The
work of Geesink and Meijer in relation to frequency
aspects of their proposed bio-soliton quantum RNA replicator is discussed and
expanded upon by considering the notions of primordial input of planetary Schumann
resonance and atmospheric Microwave protection at water, hydroxyl and hydrogen
frequencies to predict DNA structure, chirality and which broadcasting frequencies
are unsafe. The hypothesis is tested by showing these are the very frequencies
present to excess at houses and buildings wherein cancer sufferers are living
or have lived. A list of the potentially
most unsafe frequencies is calculated and disclosed. Specific support is given to Hallberg and
Johansson’s observation of strong epidemiological association between Melanoma
and FM broadcasting. In a specific
Melanoma case examined RF activation of the yeast cell cycle may have added to
Candidiasis loading of the Melanoma concerned. This short paper goes a long way to
clearing up the mystery as to why there has been so much conflict over the
effects of RF radiation and Biosystems. Subtle changes in frequency (and
modulation scheme) which also equally counts as frequency via the context of
information in a quantum coherent system accounting for the manifold different
observations in the literature. Other
aspects not discussed here are phase application aspects which I have discussed
elsewhere in relation to critical antenna distances. Furthermore, it is my belief that power
windowing in these systems can be accounted for by ion cyclotron like effects
or by immune T-cell/ APC spatio-temporal statistical
probability considerations of the type discussed by Lauer. Briefly the conclusion is a bit like an
‘animal farm’ all frequencies are
‘equal’ but some are more equal (dangerous) than others. That danger can and
has been and doubtless will also continue also to be exploited and used as a
double edged sword as more and more frequency based cancer treatments are
developed. Likewise, as I have predicted
in some of my previous papers, safer communication and broadcasting systems
will ultimately have to be developed.
This work shows also that neither task will be impossible.
Introduction
Very
recently indeed two very revealing publications have appeared which offer food
for thought not only about our origins as a human species but also on every
level our interaction with the Universe around us.
First,
is the observation that there are possible specific modulated radio frequencies
which appear capable, at lease in a few cases, to cause the stasis or
regression of certain types of cancerous tumour, see Zimmerman et al, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3845545/
Second
is the paper of Geesink and Meijer
Which
offers a bio-soliton explanation on the origins of life at the surface of
certain types of primordial clathrate.
But moreover elicits Frolich’s quantum
coherence model of biological systems and provides a set of effective
frequencies rather akin to the notion of the Bose-Einstein condensate.
The
paper then goes on to ascribe these condensate frequencies as somehow
intrinsically biologically safe (life
stabilising) on the basis of over a hundred references in the scientific literature. Further it goes on to describe a set of frequencies in-between these
condensate frequencies as inherently life
de-stabilising on the basis of a much smaller quotient of scientific
evidence. In the fact of reality, many of the references the paper cites can
neither be readily found nor have had the correct conclusion drawn. Nevertheless, the purpose of this comment is
not to deflate the paper in general. It is clearly the product of two excellent
minds and offers me, the present
author, a chance to expand in search of
what is safe and what is not biologically safe for use in modern communication
systems.
Figure 1: Beneficial and Detrimental
Frequencies ( only according to Geesink and Meijer)
Further,
I can accept the notion of the clathrate as an RNA replicator. However, modern
life also features DNA. Very
controversial as it may seem Dr Mae Wam Ho claims that DNA sequences can be reconstituted from
electromagnetic water memory, http://www.i-sis.org.uk/DNA_sequence_reconstituted_from_Water_Memory.php.
It
is my view that the further development of the origins of life can be
reconciled if we have both the frequency provision of the clathrates and the
only other primordial frequency provisions that were around at the time
i.e. Earth and the other planetary
system’s Schuman resonance frequencies.
An incredible sensitivity to these frequencies would have been displayed
due to the tiny field strengths involved.
For example power levels generated in coherently communicating cells are
estimated to be as low as 10^-18 Watt
and never higher than about 10^-10 Watt and in terms of received sensitivity changes in Earth’s
magnetic field we are at pico-tesla levels here.
An
intriguing, almost creation like facet, is that when these frequencies are
introduced into the equation they fit almost exactly into specific slots on the
clathrate replicator condensate frequency scale or, and equally as importantly
into some but not all of the slots in-between, some of those from hereon I
shall refer to as anti-condensate frequencies.
It
is further my guess that the natural asymmetry provided, a preference for a
dominance (5:4) of clathrate frequencies but not 100% could have somehow been
instrumental in the substitution of Thymine for Uracil and the preference for L-amino chirality that we see in life
today.
It
is thus my present hypothesis that any extraneous frequencies which have even
sub-harmonics or even harmonics which disturb the below frequencies labelled ‘SR’ could be particularly deleterious.
Thus perhaps the frequencies labelled ‘SR’ are the true life stabilising
frequencies but because of their intrinsically very sensitive development we
could not expect the application of external frequency to further ‘stabilise’
them. There will even be expected to be
added tiers of complexity such as the satisfaction of phase relationships and
power windowing which is also reported in frequency- biology interaction.
Figure 2: Condensate and Anti-condensate frequencies
which coincide with natural planetary Schumann resonance mainly of Earth but
also of Venus, Saturn, Jupiter and Titan.
Just
as life developed provided by certain frequencies, equally importantly, it also
developed shielded from certain deleterious frequencies in which case with such
processes there must have been an absolutely delicate balance between frequency
input leaking past the attenuator/shield and the clathrate input. Generally, protection was from excess U/V
radiation by the atmosphere but more specifically from certain microwave
frequencies entering earth’s environment as broad band radiation from the Sun
and Galactic Cosmos. Such narrow -band of protection are/were offered by
microwave absorption of water, OH- and Hydrogen. One can factor in these protected frequencies
wherein the development of life must have depended on absolutely critical
balance.
Figure 3: Frequencies of figure 2
above but also showing atmosphere ‘protected’ frequencies.
Of
particular note are the condensate frequencies; 324 and 432 Hz which have a
three-way balance between clathrate replicator input, Schumann resonance input
and microwave mediated (narrow band protected) input. Also of particular note are the anti-condensate
frequencies 332.6 and 374.4 which have a two-way balance between SR input and
microwave protection.
My
present hypothesis thus further proposes that if these specific condensates are
disturbed by application of extraneous frequency (or a greater proportion of
them) bio-damage including the possibly of cancer is a possible result.
Testing
the Hypothesis
The above hypothesis
predicts that there should be frequencies in use by broadcasters and for mobile
communications that have deleterious
effects on us and plants and animals (bio-damage) but equally that there
should be frequencies which are innocuous.
There are two ways of
testing the hypothesis. Firstly, one
can look at existing scientific literature and results of various biological
studies including those on employment epidemiology, geospatial epidemiology
around TV towers and the like, animal studies, plant studies and in vitro cell
culture studies and the like.
Secondly, one can organise one’s own frequency studies using real time frequency spectrum analysis
at buildings and locations where cancer sufferers live or have lived
recently.
Further by combined the
results of experimentation on specific frequencies found in the literature and
specific cancer cases it is possible to get some idea as to whether the radio
frequency environment may have acted as an initiator of cancer or a promoter or
both.
Figure
4: Some common cancer associated frequencies
A
number of common frequencies were found to be present at buildings/ locations
wherein cancer victims either presently live or lived prior to their demise.
The ‘effects’ of each common frequency have been collated through trawling
thorough literally hundreds of published works (too many to reference here in
this short paper) and deducing a majority/consensus effect for each
frequency. This is because rarely do
all the published works agree. Take just
one frequency for example 900 MHz GSM (condensate 429) wherein some 35 % of the
experiments report ROS (free radical or reactive oxygen species effects),
another 35% reports membrane transport effects, 17% report mitotic spindle
effects, 8 % report no or neutral effect, 4% report tetragenic
effect and the remainder proliferation effects.
Drop the frequency just
slightly to 835.62 MHz and all experiments report no biological effects,
equivalent to a frequency between the two Calcium channel results above.
Drop the frequency
further to 800 MHz and most
experiments report aneuploidy.
At other frequencies
mitochondrial ATP is reportedly disturbed.
Thus the findings in the
literature are generally in line with the highly quantised frequency windowing
effects predicted by the present hypothesis.
Specific
Cancer Cases considered in more detail
The
cases of Brain, Breast and Colon cancer in the table are instructive. All three victims are/were non-smokers and
did not drink alcohol to excess. It
would appear that here RF radiation, purely because of the chance combination
of frequencies arising had the potential to be both initiator and
promoter of cancer. Indeed, at the
premises of the breast cancer sufferer there are no fewer than 5 different
frequency sources all active on or close to the 374.4 Hz cell cycle
frequency. There were also 3 such frequencies active at the home of the
colon cancer sufferer wherein there was also a case cat cancer.
In
homes where no cancer sufferers have been noted there are usually no or maybe
just frequency active here. Turning to the case of Larynx cancer. This was very
close to the case of Colon cancer but only one frequency associated with
Oncogene induction was found. The victim was a heavy smoker and drinker of hard
liquor both of which would have also contributed to the demise.
At
the home of the lung cancer sufferer frequencies were present which could have
led to promotion but most probably heavy smoking was a likely initiator.
The
case of Melanoma is particularly interesting. Candidiasis is often found in
association with Melanoma. A
specific DVB frequency was found which in condensate form accelerates growth of
Candida. Cancer cell promotion could
follow as a result the Cell Cycle frequencies provided. Hallberg and Johansson have discussed Melanoma and
FM broadcasting at length. There are several references ( ) refs. Basically they show that the European
explosion of Melanoma only began after about 1955 when FM broadcasting
began. The incidence of melanoma has
been increasing steadily in many countries since 1960, but the underlying
mechanism causing this increase remains elusive. They linked melanoma incidence
to the distance to frequency modulation (FM) broadcasting towers. In one of their
studies they sought to determine if there was also a related link on a larger
scale for entire countries. Exposure-time-specific incidence was extracted from
exposure and incidence data from 4 different countries, and this was compared
with reported age-specific incidence of melanoma. Geographic differences in
melanoma incidence were compared with the magnitude of FM broadcasting as an environmental stress. The
exposure-time-specific incidence from all 4 countries became almost identical,
and they were approximately equal to the reported age-specific incidence of
melanoma. A correlation between melanoma incidence and the number of locally
receivable FM transmitters was found. Thus they concluded that melanoma is
associated with exposure to FM broadcasting.
The
centre frequency of the cell cycle condensate 374.4 Hz coincides with 98.114
MHz, a frequency close to the centre of the FM broadcasting band. It is believed thus that the present work
more firmly cements the link that Hallberg and Johansson have established.
It
would appear from the study of all the above cancers that potentially radio
signals which have Euclid’s element sub-harmonics which fall at or close to
374.4 Hz are the most dangerous of all to human life.
Dangerous frequencies in reality
It
is very instructive to translate the dangerous cell cycle condensate into
meaningful RF transmission frequencies.
Following Geesink, it is considered that
frequencies within about +/- 1.5% may also be dangerous. The list becomes
23.938
KHz Close to US Submarine communication
frequency – stronger at night
191.5
KHz LW Broadcast
393
KHz LF Radio Navigation Beacons http://www.dxinfocentre.com/ndb.htm
(nearest in UK London)
766.75
and 1535.5 KHz MW Broadcast
3.067
and 6.134 and 12. 268 and 24.563 MHz SW Broadcast – sparse use
49.772
MHz (edge of 6m Ham Radio Band is at 50 MHz) -sparse use
98.144
+/- 1.5 MHz Many stations in VHF FM broadcast -24/7
196.288
+/- 3 MHz – OLD BAND 3 TV Broadcast frequency – not in use now- May have
trunked radio communication systems in some areas.
392.576
+/- 5.85 MHz TETRA EMERGENCY SERVICE BROADCAST 24/7
785.152
+/- 11.77 MHz DVB TV and 4G in some areas – 24/7
12.56
+/- .195 GHz Satellite TV Broadcasting -24/7
It is rather ironic that this most dangerous
of frequencies covers so many well-known broadcast and communications
channels. Yet future broadcast spectrum
re-design would not be impossible once
there is sufficient understanding of and motivation form this work.
Cancer Treatment
Clearly
it would appear that there are specific frequencies which have been around
since the dawn of time which control in quantum mechanical manner the delicate
balance of life and its ability to create order (negative entropy) from chaos
in non or quasi-equilibrium scenarios.
Further
clearly, it would appear one upsets these at one’s own risk.
Cancer
cells have numerous and notable differences form healthy cells. For example, they have Young’s modulus
between two and ten times lower than normal cells depending on the particular
line. One would expect then intuitively
cancer as a system to have different vibrational modes from healthy
tissue.
It
is noted that four of the five so called tumour treating frequencies revealed
by (ref) also fit directly onto anti-condensate frequencies as defined by
figure 2 above. Also that four out of
these frequencies are protected from Microwaves by atmospheric absorption but not
coincide with Schumann resonance frequencies.
I believe this is to be expected as cancer is not a preferred state of
life.
I
cannot disclose more about my findings here as the rest of my work in this area
is presently highly Confidential.
Safe frequencies
I
am presently working on a formula to predict intrinsically safe or safer
frequencies for broadcasting. Again there is are Confidential aspects attached
and I cannot presently disclose the same.
Conclusions and Further work
This
short paper goes a long way to clearing up the mystery as to why there has been
so much conflict over the effects of RF radiation and Biosystems. Subtle
changes in frequency (and modulation scheme) which also equally counts as
frequency via the context of information in a quantum coherent system
accounting for the manifold different observations in the literature. Other aspects not discussed here are phase
application aspects which I have discussed elsewhere in relation to critical
antenna distances. Furthermore, it is my
belief that power windowing in these systems can be accounted for by ion
cyclotron like effects or by immune Tcell APC
statistical probability considerations of the type discussed by Lauer.
Briefly
the conclusion is a bit like an ‘animal farm’
all frequencies are ‘equal’ but some are more equal (dangerous) than
others.
That
danger can and has been and doubtless will also continue also to be exploited
and used as a double edged sword as more and more frequency based cancer treatments
are developed.
Likewise,
as I have predicted in some of my previous papers, safer communication and
broadcasting systems will ultimately have to be developed. This work shows also that neither task will
be impossible.